Skip to content
AgPro
Food Processing

Mid-sized Indian F&B — Capacity Expansion TEV

Published
Food processing capacity expansion TEV
2 cyclesno extra conditions
Sanction closed
₹17 Crpost right-sizing
Capex headroom preserved
5 wkend-to-end
TEV delivered in
Yesclient-internal
Framework reuse

The Challenge

A Maharashtra-based processed-food company — annual revenue in the ₹400-500 Cr range — was planning a greenfield ₹180 Cr capacity expansion across two sites: a ready-to-eat line in Aurangabad and a cold-store + repack facility in Nashik.

The project finance application was with a consortium of two public-sector banks. The banks' risk committees had flagged three concerns that existing internal projections didn't address credibly: first, the realism of the volume ramp against specific MT/month commitments already signed with modern-trade buyers; second, the cold-chain economics of the Nashik facility given Mumbai-Pune-Bangalore delivery-window constraints; third, the DSCR trajectory if input commodity prices moved to the upper bound seen in the last 36-month window. The existing internal case presented the base-case assumptions as the only case, and the banks wanted a proper TEV — not a cheerleading deck.

Our Approach

AgPro delivered a bank-format TEV in 5 weeks. The technical assessment rebuilt the capacity assumptions bottom-up from line balance and SKU mix, identifying a 12% over-sizing in the Aurangabad line that was corrected pre-sanction to save capex. The commercial assessment ran primary interviews with three of the client's four modern-trade buyers to validate offtake commitments and surface contract clauses that mattered for projections — including volume-tier discount schedules the original model had understated. The financial exhibits added base / upside / downside scenarios with named trigger assumptions (monsoon impact on input costs, lag-payment behaviour by large buyer, utilisation ramp shape), producing DSCR and IRR bands rather than a single-point base case. The risk section enumerated five named risks with specific mitigants, including a structured working-capital tie-up that materially improved the cash-conversion cycle on quarter-ended reporting.

The Outcome

The consortium sanction closed in two review cycles with no additional conditions beyond those AgPro had already built into the TEV. Capex was approved at the revised level — ₹163 Cr against the original ₹180 Cr — preserving ₹17 Cr of headroom the client later deployed into cold-chain upgrades at Nashik. Drawdown began on the original timeline. The TEV framework we delivered has been reused internally by the client's finance team for subsequent capex approvals, a secondary outcome neither side had priced at engagement start.

Start the conversation

Bring us a situation. We’ll scope an engagement against it.

Most engagements start with a 30-minute call and a written brief inside 72 hours.

Offices
Pune · New Delhi
Response time
One business day

Tell us what you're building.

We reply within one business day. Every enquiry is read by a partner.

Partner-reviewed. One business day.